Comparison of Nutrition Indices for Prognostic Utility in Patients with Sepsis: A Real-World Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Nutritional status of critically ill patients is an important factor affecting complications and mortality. This study aimed to investigate the impact of three nutritional indices, the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI), Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI), and Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT), on mortality in patients with sepsis in Japan. METHODS: This retrospective observational study used the Medical Data Vision database containing data from 42 acute-care hospitals in Japan. We extracted data on baseline characteristics on admission. GNRI, PNI, and CONUT scores on admission were also calculated. To evaluate the significance of these three nutritional indices on mortality, we used logistic regression to fit restricted cubic spline models and constructed Kaplan-Meier survival curves. RESULTS: We identified 32,159 patients with sepsis according to the inclusion criteria. Of them, 1804 patients were treated in intensive care units, and 3461 patients were non-survivors. When the GNRI dropped below 100, the risk of mortality rose sharply, as did that when the PNI dropped below about 40. An increased CONUT score was associated with increased mortality in an apparent linear manner. CONCLUSION: In sepsis management, GNRI and PNI values may potentially be helpful in identifying patients with a high risk of death.

Optimal target blood pressure in critically ill adult patients with vasodilatory shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

While the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines recommend an initial target value of 65 mmHg as the mean arterial pressure (MAP) in patients with septic shock, the optimal MAP target for improving outcomes remains controversial. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the optimal MAP for patients with vasodilatory shock, which included three randomized controlled trials that recruited 3,357 patients. Between the lower (60-70 mmHg) and higher (>70 mmHg) MAP target groups, there was no significant difference in all-cause mortality (risk ratio [RR], 1.06; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 0.98-1.16) which was similar in patients with chronic hypertension (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.98-1.24) and patients aged ≥65 years (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.99-1.21). No significant difference in adverse events was observed between the different MAP groups (RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.87-1.24); however, supraventricular arrhythmia was significantly higher in the higher MAP group (RR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.15-2.60). Renal replacement therapy was reduced in the higher MAP group of patients with chronic hypertension (RR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.71-0.98). Though the higher MAP control did not improve the mortality rate, it may be beneficial in reducing renal replacement therapy in patients with chronic hypertension. Systematic review registration: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, identifier UMIN000042624.

Seasonal Variation and Severity of Acute Abdomen in Japan: A Nine-Year Retrospective Analysis.

The seasonal incidence of acute abdomens, such as appendicitis, is reportedly more common in summer but is reported less frequently in Asia. Additionally, seasonal variations in the severity of acute abdomens have been evaluated insufficiently. This study evaluated the seasonal variations in the incidence and severity of acute abdomens in Japan. This retrospective observational study used a multicenter database containing data from 42 acute hospitals in Japan. We included all patients diagnosed with acute appendicitis, diverticulitis, cholecystitis, and cholangitis between January 2011 and December 2019. Baseline patient data included admission date, sequential organ failure assessment score, presence of sepsis, and disseminated intravascular coagulation. We enrolled 24,708 patients with acute abdomen. Seasonal admissions for all four acute abdominal diseases were the highest in summer [acute appendicitis, (OR = 1.35; 95% CI = 1.28-1.43); diverticulitis, (OR = 1.23; 95% CI = 1.16-1.31; cholecystitis (OR = 1.23; 95% CI = 1.11-1.36); and cholangitis (OR = 1.23; 95% CI = 1.12-1.36)]. The proportion of patients with sepsis and disseminated intravascular coagulation as well as the total SOFA score for each disease, did not differ significantly across seasons. Seasonal variations in disease severity were not observed.

Immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment in occupational cholangiocarcinoma: Supportive evidence for the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

BACKGROUND: Occupational cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) was first described in patients who were working at a printing company in Osaka, Japan. Recently, the therapeutic efficacy and safety of a PD1 inhibitor nivolumab are being evaluated in patients with occupational CCA in an investigator-initiated clinical trial. The therapeutic effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors are closely associated with immune cells. METHODS: Immunohistochemical analysis was performed to characterize immune cells in the tumor microenvironment of occupational CCA. The status of mismatch repair (MMR)/microsatellite instability (MSI) was also examined. RESULTS: The tumor stroma of occupational CCA was characterized by abundant infiltration of immune cells expressing CD3, CD4, CD8, CD163, FOXP3, and granzyme B. Additionally, lymphocytes expressing immune checkpoint receptors, such as PD1, CTLA4, LAG3, TIM3, and TIGIT, were frequently infiltrated. The loss of immunohistochemical expression of the MMR proteins (MLH1, MSH2, PMS2, and MSH6) was not observed in cases of occupational CCA, and MSI was not detected. CONCLUSIONS: The tumor microenvironment of occupational CCA had features of immunosuppression, and the occurrence of T-cell dysfunction or exhaustion was suggested. The results provide supportive evidence for the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for this disease.

Laparoscopic gastrectomy with and without prophylactic drains in gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: The number of patients who are undergoing laparoscopic gastrectomy for treating gastric cancer is increasing. Although prophylactic drains have been widely employed following the procedure, there are few studies reporting the efficacy of prophylactic drainage. Therefore, this study assessed the efficacy of prophylactic drains following laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. METHODS: Data of patients who received laparoscopic gastrectomy for treating gastric cancer in our institution between April 2011 and March 2017 were reviewed, and the outcomes of patients with and without a prophylactic drainage were compared. Propensity score matching was used to minimize potential selection bias. RESULTS: A total of 779 patients who underwent surgery for gastric cancer were reviewed; of these, 628 patients who received elective laparoscopic gastrectomy were included in this study. After propensity score matching, data of 145 pairs of patients were extracted. No significant differences were noted in the incidence of postoperative complications between the drain and no-drain groups (19.3% vs 11.0%, P = 0.071). The days after the surgery until the initiation of soft diet (6.3 ± 7.4 vs 4.9 ± 2.9 days, P = 0.036) and the length of postoperative hospital stay (15.7 ± 12.9 vs 13.0 ± 6.3 days, P = 0.023) were greater in the drain group than those in the no-drain group. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that routinely using prophylactic drainage following laparoscopic gastrectomy for treating gastric cancer is not obligatory.